Environment Ohio
Toledo Blade
the Editorial Board

As Ohio’s an­tic­i­pated frack­ing boom emerges, state gov­ern­ment must hold the oil and gas in­dus­try more ac­count­able for the chem­i­cals it uses in the ex­plo­ration pro­cess. This is not a mat­ter of im­ped­ing eco­nomic growth, job cre­ation, or en­ergy se­cu­rity, but rather of pro­tect­ing pub­lic health and the en­vi­ron­ment.

A new re­port con­cludes that oil and gas ex­trac­tion op­er­a­tions across the na­tion re­lease nearly 130,000 tons of haz­ard­ous pol­lut­ants a year — more than any in­dus­trial sec­tor other than power plants. Yet much of this pol­lu­tion is not re­ported un­der the U.S. En­vi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency’s Tox­ics Release In­ven­tory, a pub­lic right-to-know pro­gram.

New drill­ing tech­niques can un­lock pre­vi­ously in­ac­ces­sible oil and nat­u­ral gas through hy­drau­lic frac­tur­ing, or frack­ing, of shale rock. The pro­cess in­volves the use of toxic chem­i­cals, along with plenty of wa­ter.

Ohio ap­pears to hold some of the na­tion’s larg­est re­serves of oil and nat­u­ral gas in the east­ern and south­ern parts of the state. It can be­come a model for re­spon­si­ble frack­ing, and for un­der­ground in­jec­tion of frack­ing flu­ids.

But this year, the state’s Gen­eral As­sem­bly de­clined to re­quire frack­ing op­er­a­tions to test the flu­ids they use, or to dis­close the chem­i­cals in­volved be­fore ex­plo­ration. A new law re­quires com­pa­nies to dis­close what chem­i­cals they use af­ter the fact. But it gives them as long as two months, and in­cludes an ex­cep­tion for trade se­crets.

The new law also lim­its who can sue en­ergy com­pa­nies over such se­crets. That lim­its trans­par­ency as well.

The EPA’s tox­ics in­ven­tory con­sists of 650-some chem­i­cals. But oil and gas pro­duc­ers need not wait for a gov­ern­ment man­date to in­crease dis­clo­sure...

Link to original article